Racism shows up in different ways, HCJ has long experience of dealing with racial harassment and the racists

Harrow Council for Justice
               a campaigning national organisation - promoting the principle of 'different but equal'

About us
  Integration   Education    Contact

    Our positions

  • people are not blind to colour in a colour conscious society
  • racism affects black and white people both but differently
  • racial harassment is anti human rights - more than hate crime
  • equal opportunity is to practise 'different but equal'

Headlines click below to read

Asians – confused terminology
Kashmir debate
Open letter to prime minister
Asians – confused terminology
Casey review
Casey review – more expectations
Increased focus on equalities, justice
Bexit politics hitting children & schools
Do we really need grammar schools
Post-Brexit racism crimes
Selfish vision to leave EU
No forced academies
Love for India and steel crisis
Rhetoric of accountability
Muslim women in right-wing headlines
Concerns about Harrow CCG
Listen to all Londoners
Scandalous plan to cut welfare benefits
Schools could do without politics
Using migrants as springboard
‘Do first, and say sorry later’
Blair, the savvier!
UKIP in race-headlines!
Politics of inequality & injustice
Love for India – really?
Cameron targets minority voters
Prison situation
Reviving ‘snoopers' charter’
Palestinian statehood
Gaza & Warsi out of the news
Wake-up call for Warsi
Political immaturity in Harrow
Harrow Council institutionally racist?

Why Tower Hamlets and not Harrow?
Who decides the political map!
Scaremongering in Harrow!
• Harrow Council with no party in
• Shah is bitter as his dynasty collapses
• Political parties want 'foot soldiers’
• Ousted - Labour Group leader
• Conservatives poor under Cllr Hall
• Community grants in Harrow setting

• Sharp increase in homelessness
• Engagement with older citizens
• Met racism inquiry
• Fuel poverty - a national problem
Code of conduct - public accountability
• Would standards committees be missed
'Don't play politics with the economy'
Broken Society'
HPCCG plight
Community consultation
• Housing benefit changes hit the
  vulnerable most

Community lettings
Threat to social cohesion
A school of national interest
The Freedom of Information (FOI) Act

NHS - Dr Foster Hospital Guide
Immigrants to create extra households?
Student unrest over fee
Progressive approach to town twinning
Twinning - Harrow's situation
Re-claiming the 'inner cities'
Housing benefit cuts – onslaught on   vulnerable
'Big Society'

Tory Deception

GP data (H) GP data (N)


The HCJ is not under the influence of any political party nor it is in the business of promoting councillors or other elected representatives but it shares its analysis of socio-political and economic situations with voters to help them to make well informed democratic choices.
Copyright © 2005-2017 HCJ all pages

Difficult to disagree with the education select committee that calls new grammar schools an 'unnecessary distraction'!

"The focus on opening new grammar schools is, in my view, an unnecessary distraction from the need to ensure all our young people are equipped with the skills to compete in the modern workplace," said Neil Carmichael, the committee's chair.

It can only be good that the committee has taken onboard serious concerns expressed by teachers, parents and teaching professionals about the grammar proposals.

For example, Sir Michael Wilshaw, the previous Ofsted chief, said that a return to grammar school selection would be an economic disaster, leaving young people without the skills the country needs, and that the grammar schools will fail the poorest children.

Public protests have expressed strong feelings against the proposed wave of grammar schools.

It is very worrying that the public attention is distracted through the new grammar schools agenda at a time where there is a crisis in teacher recruitment, many pupils are in super-sized classes and schools budgets are being cut - the £3bn funding gap facing schools over the next five years.

Despite its high spin to justify more grammar schools, the government has failed to establish how grammars, based on selective entry, would improve social mobility and close the gap between rich and poor pupils as Prime Minister Theresa May argued for an ‘element of selection’ to give parents and children wider choice.

It was also suggested that although the new grammars would be much more selective than traditional grammars, there would be a single national entry test for grammars, rather than a range of local tests, with the aim of designing an exam that would be more resistant to coaching by private tutors.

The MPs found no convincing evidence that a test could be devised which would not favour those who could afford private coaching.

In any case, the rising free school meal situation due to the government’s adverse benefits policies and austerity measures don’t allow private tutoring for 11-plus entry preparation in most cases.

Selecting pupils by academic ability and giving a grammar school education to some is highly unhelpful in narrow the gap of learning by groups of pupils which has remained a long-standing national challenge.

The committee has also rightly called on the government to carry out an assessment of the potential impact on the wider school system.

The state school sector already suffers because of the dynamics of allocating finances to schools and could suffer further because of the drain of high performing pupils and teachers to grammar schools.

Schools have always and will always belong in society. Therefore, a national system of education must aim at producing citizens who can take their place in society properly equipped to exercise rights and perform duties the same as those of other citizens. 

Teaching of the skills and acquiring knowledge to match socio-commercial requirements are far more important than the teaching of a socially constructed and packaged knowledge required to achieve grammar school and selective societal goals, including class divisions. 

Many grammars fail to operate within their local context where a mismatch between a child’s everyday life experiences and the grammar school culture results in a social and learning conflict, leading to underachievement.

I remember inspecting a grammar school surrounded by small ‘corner’ shops in a most diverse and run down inner city area that could contribute little to the school life/ population.

Education needs not to have political experimentation through the initiatives like free schools, academies and grammar schools because of a perceived need to protect the social, political and class fabric of our society.

Prime Minister Theresa May, a politician and not an education practitioner, should address why increasing ‘free school meals’ and ‘underachievement’ in education and beyond rather than using grammar schools strategy to deflect from other burning national issues. 15/2/2017

Grammar schools – not a convincing case!